Rights & Constitution · Live

Should the DOJ subpoena reporters to unmask their sources?

0 votes 3 days ago Cast your vote to see the split
The facts

On July 11, 2026, the New York Times reported that the DOJ subpoenaed several of its journalists to testify before a federal grand jury about their Air Force One story.

The underlying article detailed security concerns tied to a Boeing 747 donated by Qatar for use as a presidential aircraft.

The First Amendment does not explicitly protect reporters from grand jury subpoenas, per the Supreme Court's 1972 Branzburg v. Hayes ruling.

There is no federal shield law; 49 states and DC offer some journalist-source protection, but Congress has never passed a national version.

In 2021, then-Attorney General Merrick Garland issued a policy barring the DOJ from seizing reporters' records in leak investigations, a rule the current administration has moved to loosen.

Cast your vote
Should the DOJ subpoena reporters to unmask their sources?
Live
Live results — voters
No — press freedom means reporters don't rat out sources0%
Yes — national security leaks demand accountability0%
See live results from live voters
Cast your vote to unlock America’s reaction
Anonymous · one vote per person
You vs America
You matched the majority.
Your vote lines up with the current national reaction: most voters agree with you.
Your vote
VS
America
How states are voting
Not enough votes yet to show state-level results — check back as more people vote.
Compare with people like you?
Optional: pick how you describe yourself politically to unlock sharper anonymous comparisons.
Full results — votes
Your vote lines up with the current national reaction: most voters agree with you.
No — press freedom means reporters don't rat out sources0%
Yes — national security leaks demand accountability0%